在应用过程中,我们偶然会碰到想要在增加index前看看该index是否能带来预期的效果。为了达到这个目标,我们可以使用oem的virtual index的功能。为了能让大家比较简单地了解这个功能,我们为大家演示一下不在oem下virtual index的使用。
另外,即然叫virtual index, 那么当建立它时,应当不耗资源的。这对于很大的表,当我们想看建某个index是否能改善当前语句的执行计划时,显然很有帮助。我们来看例子: 有一news表,400多M。有语句: Code: [Copy to clipboard] select count(*) from News where Gmt_Origin >= trunc(sysdate + 0.5) and Gmt_Origin < trunc(sysdate + 0.5) + 1 and news_type_general = 'y' and ((News_Category_Id IN (100901,5002640,5002641,100902,5000042,5001060,5002041,9)) OR (News_Category_Id_2 IN (100901,5002640,5002641,100902,5000042,5001060,5002041,9)) OR (News_Category_Id_3 IN (100901,5002640,5002641,100902,5000042,5001060,5002041,9))); 它使用了index,然而效果并不理想: Code: [Copy to clipboard] Operation Object Name Rows Bytes Cost Object Node In/Out PStart PStop SELECT STATEMENT Hint=CHOOSE 1 267 SORT AGGREGATE 1 28 FILTER TABLE Access BY INDEX ROWID NEWS 1 28 267 INDEX RANGE SCAN NEWS_RELATED3_IND 1 266 分析条件后,我们认为在gmt_origin上建index可能会有帮助,然而我们并不清楚有于其他indexes的影响,当我们建了基于gmt_origin的index时,是否的确会有帮助。 于是我们预备在gmt_origin上建个virtual index: Code: [Copy to clipboard] SQL> alter session set sql_trace = true; Session altered. SQL> create index news_gorigin_ind on news(gmt_origin) nosegment ; Index created. trace是: Code: [Copy to clipboard] create index news_gorigin_ind on news(gmt_origin) nosegment call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Parse 1 0.06 0.08 2 4 0 0 Execute 1 0.02 0.42 0 2 2 0 Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- total 2 0.08 0.50 2 6 2 0 Misses in library cache during parse: 1 Optimizer goal: CHOOSE 我们可以从tracer看出,建立它的确是不耗多少资源。 为了能利用这个virtual index,我们还必须修改当前session参数: Code: [Copy to clipboard] SQL> alter session set "_use_nosegment_indexes" = true; Session altered. 现在我们来看看效果: SQL> eXPlain plan for 2 select count(*) from News 3 where Gmt_Origin >= trunc(sysdate + 0.5) 4 and Gmt_Origin < trunc(sysdate + 0.5) + 1 5 and news_type_general = 'y' 6 and ((News_Category_Id IN (100901,5002640,5002641,100902,5000042,5001060,5002041,9)) 7 OR (News_Category_Id_2 IN (100901,5002640,5002641,100902,5000042,5001060,5002041,9)) 8 OR (News_Category_Id_3 IN (100901,5002640,5002641,100902,5000042,5001060,5002041,9))) 9 / Explained. SQL> @$Oracle_HOME/rdbms/admin/utlxpls PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Id Operation Name Rows Bytes Cost ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 SELECT STATEMENT 1 20 3 1 SORT AGGREGATE 1 20 2 FILTER 3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID NEWS 1 20 3 4 INDEX RANGE SCAN NEWS_GORIGIN_IND 3 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cpu costing is off, 'plan_table' is old version 12 rows selected. 执行计划显示它的确用到了我们预备建的index。
设置10053看看 -- Index stats INDEX NAME: NEWS_GMODIFIED_IND COL#: 3 TOTAL :: LVLS: 2 #LB: 1295 #DK: 21318 LB/K: 1 DB/K: 8 CLUF: 186911 INDEX NAME: NEWS_GORIGIN_IND COL#: 7 TOTAL :: LVLS: 1 #LB: 25 #DK: 100 LB/K: 1 DB/K: 1 CLUF: 800 ... Access path: index (scan) Index: NEWS_GORIGIN_IND TABLE: NEWS RSC_CPU: 0 RSC_IO: 3 IX_SEL: 4.5000e-03 TB_SEL: 1.1250e-05 ... Access path: index (index-only) Index: NEWS_GORIGIN_IND TABLE: NEWS RSC_CPU: 0 RSC_IO: 2 IX_SEL: 4.5000e-03 TB_SEL: 4.5000e-03
|